This is an essay about "12 Angry Men", by Reginald Rose. It describes juror 6 and the cons of the Jury System.

Juror 6: In the story 12 fantastic Men, by Reginald Rose, juror cardinal is described as an honest provided slow man, one who checks it difficult to create a compulsive opinion, and is often listening and slowly trying to attend the opinions of other(a)s, rather then forming his own. In the text of the play, we can find examples of numerous of these characteristics of juror sestet and even more that were non abandoned to us by the author. The prototypic, and most obvious arrogate near his personality is seen in the play but cannot be make up in words. This is the act of not talking. Although not written of course, six-spoter does not say anything until about devil thirds of the way into the first Act. This shows how six is a very quite man and instead of talking, he just wants to listen and gestate the opinion of the other jurors first. Even when six starts talking, the same qualities argon still shown. sextet: I dont know. I started to be convinced, you know, with the recommendation from those people crossways the hall (12 Angry Men, p.137.) This quote from six clearly shows his retardant to the situation and also his characteristic of advance upon his opinions slowly and existence hard to convince.

I believe that half-dozen does not in truth fully understand the sinless situation with the murder and rightfully isnt sure who he agrees with. nonetheless he takes all the jurors opinions into devotion and eventually makes the right preference to vote non-guilty. Another characteristic of six is that he is a calm man and is one of the a couple of(prenominal) jury men that real wants to stay in the room and! keep the flip going. contradictory almost all the other jurors in the room, six never loses his... If you want to get a full essay, recite it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay